Legal Opinion
People v. Osorio CA4/3
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 2015No. G048876UnpublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Introduction
After defendant Jesus Francisco Osorio violated a condition of his parole, he was arrested and jailed. California’s Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Adult Parole Operations (the Department) recommended that defendant’s parole be revoked. Defendant demurred to the petition for revocation. The trial court overruled the demurrer, revoked defendant’s parole, credited him with time served, and then reinstated him on parole.
We reverse because the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the petition for revocation of parole. The petition…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re LawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Josiah Z.California Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. DeLeonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. ScarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Castel, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Zamudio, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Hoffman v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.