Hoffman v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtIkola, J.
*1088The issue in this writ proceeding is whether an information may allege a single offense in a single count, but describe within that count multiple discrete acts, each of which constitute the charged offense. Here, the People have alleged 121 counts of healthcare insurance fraud. ( Pen. Code, § 550, subds. (a)(5), (a)(6).)1 Each count identifies multiple patient files and a timeframe that spans years. Defendant demurred to the information. The court overruled the demurrer and defendant then filed the present writ petition.
We conclude the information is proper and will deny the writ petition.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beasley v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Heidary v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Heidary v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Ramsey CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021