Dulek v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
The facts that led up to the arrest and prosecution of plaintiff in error are as follows:
A federal prohibition agent, looking for violators of the Volstead Act (Comp. St.- § 10138% et seq.), came upon a 40-aere farm of plaintiff in error. In his quest he came upon a shack or a cabin, located in a wooded swamp and not visible from outside the woods. He -walked around in front, and looking through an open door saw a- still and its appurtenances in operation within the shack. Prom this small building, 12 feet by 16 feet, a path led out through the swamp and through an inclosed lot, and then on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Guaresimo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
3Cited by18 opinions
- Orval Care v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Roberson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Jewel Polk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.