Legal Opinion

Dulek v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1926No. 4641PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts that led up to the arrest and prosecution of plaintiff in error are as follows:

A federal prohibition agent, looking for violators of the Volstead Act (Comp. St.- § 10138% et seq.), came upon a 40-aere farm of plaintiff in error. In his quest he came upon a shack or a cabin, located in a wooded swamp and not visible from outside the woods. He -walked around in front, and looking through an open door saw a- still and its appurtenances in operation within the shack. Prom this small building, 12 feet by 16 feet, a path led out through the swamp and through an inclosed lot, and then on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Guaresimo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Orval Care v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  2. Roberson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  3. Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Jewel Polk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API