Legal Opinion
Hedlund v. Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 4, 2016No. 09-99019PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurrence by
Judge BEA;
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by JudgeWARDLAW
ORDER
The opinion filed March 4, 2016, and reported at 815 F.3d 1233, is hereby amended concurrent with the filing of an Amended Opinion today. With these amendments, Judges Bea and N.R. Smith voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wardlaw voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Paterek v. Village of Armada, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Ernesto Martinez v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- In re Pers. Restraint of ArnoldWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Christopher Spreitz v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- John Sansing v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.