Legal Opinion

School District No. 1J Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 20, 1991No. Civ. Nos. 90-1316-FR, 90-753-FRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRYE, District Judge:

The following motions are pending:

1) the motion for summary judgment of defendant T & N pic (# 173);

2) the motion for partial summary judgment of defendant GAF Corporation (# 175);

3) the motion for partial summary judgment of defendant Owens-Corning Fiberglas (# 178);

4) the motion for partial summary judgment of defendant Georgia-Pacific Corporation (# 181);

5) the motion for partial summary judgment of defendants Armstrong Cork Company, Inc. and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (# 182);

6) the motion for partial summary judgment of defendant United States Gypsum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,468 Ernest C. Hector v. Herman Wiens, Individually and Dba Wiens Feed LotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. Senn v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Catasauqua Area School District v. Raymark Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huber v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. Holcomb v. Georgia Pacific, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. School District No. 1J v. AcandS, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API