Legal Opinion
Louis Napier v. Karen J. Preslicka
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 10, 2002No. 00-13064PublishedCited by 426 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
In this case of first impression, we decide whether 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e), a provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996) (“PLRA”), applies to claims that arise out of the arrest of an imprisoned plaintiff and claims unrelated to the current incarceration of that plaintiff. The *531district court held that § 1997e(e) applied under the facts of this case, and we AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
On 30 September 1997, deputies Karen J. Preslicka and Sandra M. Pomeroy approached Louis Napier and asked him for identification. Napier produced a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bilal v. DriverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Harris v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- William Mitchell v. Phillip Morris IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by426 opinions
- Ned Hughes v. Charles LottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Fred Dalton Brooks v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Angel Soto v. Unknown SweetmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Smith v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- McCoy v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
421 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.