Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert D. Hazel
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 15, 1991No. 90-3067PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
Concurring opinion filed by Chief Judge MIKVA.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
This appeal concerns two separate questions under the United States Sentencing Guidelines: the interplay between the career offender and criminal history provisions, and the meaning of the acceptance of responsibility guideline. Appellant was labeled a career offender under § 4B1.1, but, because one of the two prior convictions could have been set aside at the time, the district court decided to depart downward on the Criminal History Category under § 4A1.3, without…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Raymond Francis BayerleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Leonard Orozco BuenrostroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Lucio MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ian Gordon, United States of America v. Ian GordonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Pedro v. SpedalieriCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Rufus Washington v. Gerald HofbauerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Dorcely, DanielCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Renford George SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Cordell Spencer, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.