Legal Opinion

Belding v. Coward

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 15, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilbrook, J.

The complainants, Frank O. Belding and Fi-ederic M. Burnham, are administrators d. b. n. c. t. a., of the estate of Charles Fry, and executors of the will of John Fry, son of Charles.

Charles Fry died September 3, 1910, leaving no widow. There survived him two sons, John and Charles, Jr., also two sisters, Elizabeth Fry Ridgway and Isabel Fry Norris. His will was dated January 20, 1910.

Isabel died January 20, 1922, intestate, her husband having predeceased her, leaving as her heirs at law, J. Parker Norris, Henry Norris, Edith Norris Shober, John R. Norris, Mary Norris Biggs, Philip Norris,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Ducker v. BurnhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  4. Estate of WengerdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Waddell v. WaddellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. First Portland National Bank v. Kaler-Vaill Memorial HomeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
  3. Abbott v. DanforthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
  4. Cook v. StevensSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
  5. Dow v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API