Legal Opinion

Bucki v. Cone

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison county. Action on the case. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, J.:

This action was brought in Madison* county, and in the original and amended declarations is>styled an action on the case. It was against Louis Bucki and Charles Bucki, partners, doing business under the name, firm and style of L. Bucki & Son, and the declaration ran against them accordingly. The amended declaration avers that “on the 80th day of June, 1884, the-plaintiff (Cone) was lawfully enfranchised and the legal owner of a certain toll bridge spanning the Suwanneeriver at the White Sulphur Springs, Florida, the northern' abutments of said bridge resting upon the bank of said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Morgan v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Brown v. ChadbourneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
  4. Russ v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1865
  5. Jacksonville Street Railway Co. v. ChappellSupreme Court of Florida · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bessie Cannon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. City of Miami v. SandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. FoxworthSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  4. Martin v. BuschSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. Broward v. MabrySupreme Court of Florida · 1909

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API