Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 7, 1883PublishedCited by 20 opinions

ORIGINAL. Motion to dismiss a petition for mandamus to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia to direct that court to take jurisdiction in a replevin suit.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

This petition shows that the' Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company brought an action of replevin against John E. Hamilton in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia to recover the . possession of certain railroad cars; that a summons for the defendant and a writ of replevin for the property were issued in the suit; that the defendant Hamilton was duly served with the summons; that the property sued for was taken by the marshal under the writ of replevin and delivered to the company; that a declaration was filed, and. that before pleading thereto Hamilton…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Railway CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Ex Parte HoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Ex Parte LoringSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Ex Parte RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Ex Parte the Union Steamboat CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. In Re MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API