Legal Opinion

(HC) Forbes v. Eldridge

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 1, 2020No. 2:16-cv-01884Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HOWARD FORBES, No. 2:16-cv-01884 MCE GGH P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 L. ELDRIDGE, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Introduction and Summary 19 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). 22 Petitioner’s primary claim involves the seemingly inadvertent failure on the part of the 23…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API