Niagara Falls International Bridge Co. v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Crouch, J.:
This action is brought to restrain defendants from switching cars and trains on the upper floor of the Steel Arch bridge over the Niagara river.
Plaintiffs are the owners of the bridge. Defendants occupy and use the upper floor under certain agreements in the nature of leases. The complaint alleges that the acts of defendants are contrary to the provisions of the agreements and to the purposes for which the bridge was designed and built; that they damage the bridge and imperil the safety of the public using it; and that plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law. The answer puts in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of New York v. New York City Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. Miller & LuxSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- California Development Co. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- Waldorf-Astoria Segar Company v. . SalomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Madden v. RosseterNew York Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Rapid-American Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Portsmouth Baseball Corporation v. Ford C. Frick, Commissioner of Baseball Baltimore Baseball Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- DiCola v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (In Re Prudential Lines, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- La Chemise Lacoste v. Alligator CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.