Legal Opinion

Madden v. Rosseter

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Motion- for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

Plaintiff is a resident of New York and the defendant of California. Each owns a half interest in the thoroughbred stallion Friar Bock, which the plaintiff now values at $250,000. In fact the defendant paid the plaintff $30,000 for a half interest in the horse more than two and a half years ago.

Under the written agreement of sale dated June 29, 1918, the defendant was to have possession and use of Friar Bock in California during the seasons of 1919 and 1920, the plaintiff to have him for use in Kentucky during the seasons 1921 and 1922; “ thereafter on new arrangements mutually satisfactory.”

T…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Ali v. Playgirl, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Minas De Artemisa, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  5. United States v. ManningDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API