Legal Opinion
Mincey v. Dow Chemical Co.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided March 15, 2002No. CIV.A.98-812PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TYSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a motion for partial summary judgment brought by the defendant, The Dow Chemical Company (hereafter, Dow). The plaintiff, Connie F. Mincey, has opposed this motion. Oral argument is not necessary in this matter. Jurisdiction is based on diversity (28 U.S.C. § 1332) and a federal question (28 U.S.C. § 1331), as it relates to the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA); (29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654), the Fair Labor Standards Act (FSLA; 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219), and the Americans With Disabilities Act (42…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lori L. Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration, James R. Klauser, Lee MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alleman v. Louisiana, Department of Economic DevelopmentDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Harding v. CIANBRO CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Crain v. Schlumberger Technology Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016
- Labrecque v. Sodexho USA, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Donna Laird v. Al Copeland Investments, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.