Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Leinart

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

EROM ANDERSON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Anderson County. W. R. Hicks, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

The Southern Kailway prosecutes this appeal in error from a judgment for §2,500, obtained by next friend of Robert Loving, for personal injuries. At the trial below the defendant interposed objections to the admission of several different items of testimony offered by the plaintiff, for the purpose of showing that Robert Loving was stricken by a moving train of the defendant. The objections were overruled, the testimony admitted, and exceptions noted. When the plaintiff’s testimony was concluded the defendant filed a demurrer to the evidence, embodying a literal transcript of all the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Stockwell v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Miller v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Nelson v. . WhitfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abernathy v. McCoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Heald v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Coleman v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. King v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API