Legal Opinion
SANDSTROM ON BEHALF OF SANDSTROM v. Chemlawn Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided December 6, 1989No. Civ. 89-0182-PPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS
Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss this suit in its entirety, claiming that the Court lacks the in personam jurisdiction required by Maine law and the Due Process clause of United States Constitution. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend 14; 13-A M.R.S.A. § 1212(6) (Business Corporation Act); 14 M.R.S.A. § 704-A (long-arm statute). Defendants also maintain that in personam jurisdiction is lacking because of insufficiency of service of process. 1 Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richard L. Sandstrom, Etc. v. Chemlawn CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Wenche Siemer, Etc. v. The Learjet Acquisition Corp., Mayade Bahri Helwani, Etc. v. The Learjet Acquisition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Ent. Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Emp. Practices Lit.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- WorldCare Ltd. Corp. v. World Ins. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Shaw v. 500516 N.B. Ltd.District Court, D. Maine · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.