Legal Opinion

Maryland ex rel. Carson v. Acme Poultry Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 28, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 651PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, District Judge.

This is an action brought to recover damages for a death resulting from an automobile accident. The action is brought in Delaware because the defendant is a resident of Delaware. The accident happened in Maryland, the laws of which generally govern the litigation. The deceased was a resident of Pennsylvania, subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Pennsylvania, 77 P.S. § 1 et seq., and the widow and dependents there have received compensation from the insurer of the Pennsylvania employer to which, in turn, certain rights of the dependents have become subrogated.

Defe…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. SchrieferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Greenleaf v. Safeway Trails, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Yorkshire Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McLean v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  2. Handy v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  3. Carlson v. Consumers Power CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1957
  4. Rehrer v. Service Trucking Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953
  5. Hughey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API