Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Lazarus
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 7, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Samuel J. Silverman, S.
In each of these two proceedings the committee of an incompetent income beneficiary of a trust requests a direction to the trustee to pay over to the committee part or all of the income of which the incompetent is the beneficiary.
In both cases the granting of the petition would mean that the committee, rather than the trustee, would administer (and to some extent apply) and act, as custodian of the income. It would also mean that there would be double commissions on the income paid over — the trustee’s commission and the committee’s commission.
Estate of Laura R. Lazarus
T…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bloodgood v. . LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- New York Trust Co. v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- The New York Trust Company v. . BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Gasquet v. PollockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- In re McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of HeschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Armata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- In re the Estate of DaubneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1992
- In re SalvatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Armata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974