Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Daubney

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 27, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Raymond Radigan, J.

Is the income from a testamentary trust which the trustee is directed to expend for clothing, comforts and luxuries of the beneficiary, Paul Kemp, a resource available to pay the claim of New York State for the care and treatment furnished to the beneficiary in a State-operated intermediate care facility? That question poses the central issue in this proceeding. The secondary issue is whether the court has jurisdiction.

Paul Kemp is a patient residing in a facility operated by the Long Island Developmental Center which is a component of the New York…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re CarmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. In re the Estate of EscherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
  3. In re GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Hoelzer v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Maul v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BrossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1995
  2. Trust Co. of Okl. v. State Ex Rel. DdhsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API