Rodd v. W. H. King Drug Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
Since all of the evidence supports the finding by the jury that there was a breach of warranty in that there was a defect in the color enlarger purchased by plaintiff from defendant for use in her commercial photography business, we find that the primary question before this Court relates to damages. The defendant assigns error in the charge of the court on the damage issue and the denial of the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict.
In her complaint plaintiff alleged damages as follows:
“(15) That, because of defendant’s breaches of warranty and failure to take such steps as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Swift Co. v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Swift & Co. v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Aldridge Motors, Inc. v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Gurney Industries, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, and Robert P. Perrin, Trustee in Reorganization for Roberts Company and Roberts Engineers, Inc., Gurney Industries, Inc., and Commercial Credit Industrial Corporation v. Robert P. Perrin, Trustee in Reorganization for Roberts Company and Roberts Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Stanford v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Griffin v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.