Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Fischbach

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 30, 1934No. 13,329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Stella M. Armstrong brought suit to set aside a conveyance of real estate by Mrs. Fischbach to Mrs. Strauss, to have the property adjudged to be the property of the former, and to subject it to the payment of a judgment obtained by the plaintiff against Mrs. Fischbach.

On November 30, 1929, Mrs. Fischbach executed her promissory note for $2,000 and secured it by her deed of trust -of certain real property in Alamosa. Mrs. Armstrong became the owner of the note. On April 19,1932, Mrs. Fischbach deeded her other real property (i. e., the property involved in this suit) to her daughter, Mrs.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thuringer v. TraftonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  2. Fahey v. FaheySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Chalupa v. PrestonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. Myers v. HaydenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Roberts v. DietzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  2. Genova v. ChampionUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  3. United States v. SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API