Spencer v. Ford Motor Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGribbs, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant Ford Motor Company, pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(3), on plaintiffs’ products liability action. Defendant Firestone Tire & Rubber Company appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(3), on plaintiffs’ duty to warn theory. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
In May of 1977, plaintiff Robert Spencer was employed by a Union 76 automotive service station. One of his duties was to repair truck tires. An employee of Vegelheim Lumber Company brought a Ford…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Smith v. E R Squibb & Sons, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Mascarenas v. Union Carbide Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ronnie K. Baughman v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Ford Motor Co. v. WoodCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.