Legal Opinion
Butte County, Cal. v. Hogen
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 13, 2010No. 09-5179PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge.
I
The issue in this appeal from the judgment of the district court arises from efforts of the Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Ranchería in Butte County, California, to obtain federal approval to conduct gaming operations. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721, permits federally-recognized Indian tribes to conduct gaming on “Indian lands.” The *192Act defines “Indian lands” to mean all lands within any Indian reservation and “any lands title…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tourus Records, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- CTS Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Amerijet International, Inc. v. John PistoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Ark Initiative v. Thomas TidwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.