Lane v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, District Judge.
On September 24,1998, petitioner filed a “Writ of Habeas Corpus Motion under 28 § 2241.” This “motion” was assigned to the Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds. On November 19,1998, the government filed a response.
On June 7, 1999, Judge Edmunds issued an Opinion and Order construing petitioner’s “Writ of Habeas Corpus Motion,” brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, as a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Having determined that petitioner’s motion should be construed as a motion brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Judge Edmunds properly determined that this case…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- George C. Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999