Ringle v. Wallis Iron Works
New York Supreme Court
Appeal by the defendant, The Wallis Iron Works, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 15th day of October, 1894, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term adjudging the amount due on the plaintiffs’ mechanic’s lien and directing the payment thereof.
1Opinion of the Court
Yan Brunt, P. J'.:
This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed by the plaintiffs, as sub-contractors, against certain property belonging to the defendant, The Terminal Warehouse Company, known as pier No. 57, North river, to secure a sum of money claimed to be due and owing from the defendant and appellant, The Wallis Iron "'^’orks, to them. Notice of plaintiffs’ lien was filed on the 16th of February, 1892, and this action was begun as to the appellant, The Wallis Iron Works, on the 5th of May, 1892, by summons dated April 26, 1892. On the 1st of April, 1892, upoa the Wallis…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Sears v. WiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- In re EmslieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900
- Johnson Service Co. v. HildebrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- New Jersey Steel & Iron Co. v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- McAveney v. PasquiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.