Legal Opinion
Fross v. MJPB, Inc. (In Re Fross)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2001No. BAP No. KS-00-028. Bankruptcy No. 94-21906PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY MANDATE AND MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
2Per curiam
The matter before the Court is the Motion to Stay Mandate and Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (“Motion”), filed by the Appellants, Thomas and Melinda Fross (“Debtors”). The Appellee, MJPB, Inc. (“MJPB”), does not oppose the portion of the Motion seeking a stay pending appeal, and it has not responded to the portion of the Motion seeking a stay of the mandate. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
In In re Fross, BAP No. KS-98-030, 1999…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robert Stewart v. Donald DongesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- McClendon v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Lofstedt v. Kendall (In re Kendall)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- Mountain Empire Oil Co. v. Callahan (In Re Lambert Oil Co.)District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2007
- Willcox v. StroupDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
- In re: M&C Partnership, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021