Legal Opinion
McClendon v. City of Albuquerque
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1996No. Nos. 96-2056, 96-2057PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants-Appellants and Petitioners seek an emergency stay pending appeal of the district court’s order limiting their authority to independently select places of confinement for inmates. Covering all bases, they also seek a writ of prohibition against the district court enjoining the court from enforcing the condition. I find that the application for the stay is well taken and should be granted; although I have jurisdiction to consider the petition for an extraordinary writ, I will exercise my discretion to refer it to a panel of this court.
Background
Defendants-Appellants and Petitioners…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Craig v. EberlyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- McClendon v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Rick Homans v. City of Albuquerque, a Municipal Corporation Margie Baca Archuleta, in Her Capacity as Clerk of the City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Allen v. AvanceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Community Television of Utah, LLC v. Aereo, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.