Legal Opinion

Sullivan County v. Ruth

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM SULLIVAN. Appeal from Chancery Court of Sullivan County. Jesse L. Rogers, Sp. Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This is an action for damages for the breach of a contract made by. the defendants with the county of Sullivan to erect a bridge across the Iiolston river at Bluff City. The Chancellor was of opinion the defendants had substantially complied with the contract and were not liable for damages, and dismissed complainant’s bill.

There was an appeal by the county, and on a hearing before the Court of Chancery Appeals that Court modified the decree of the Chancellor and gave judgment for an item of $172, with interest from the filing of the bill in this cause, this being the cost of having the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seale. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Jessee v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  2. Columbia & Big Bigby Turnpike Co. v. EnglishTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hickman County v. Nashville Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  4. Bauman v. Pickwick Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
  5. Edwards v. Maler Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API