Legal Opinion
Marckstadt v. Lockheed Martin Corp. Missiles & Fire Control
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 2008No. 27,222PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff-Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted. The opinion filed in this ease on June 6, 2008, is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted in its place.
{2} The question presented in this case is whether, under New Mexico law, the requirements for a valid rejection of uninsured motorist (UM) and/or underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage have been met when a business automobile insurance policy contains a written — but unsigned' — endorsement indicating such rejection. The district court concluded that the unsigned endorsement constituted sufficient evidence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Romero v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Gyori v. Johnston Coca-Cola Bottling Group, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Phoenix Indemnity Insurance v. PulisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Kaiser v. DeCarreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Luebbers ex rel. SalazarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marckstadt v. Lockheed Martin Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- Arias v. Phoenix Indemnity InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Romero v. Progressive Northwestern InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Federated Service Insurance v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.