Legal Opinion
Sheridan v. DeHart, et al.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided September 3, 2003No. CV-02-412-MPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Sheridan v. DeHart, et al. CV-02-412-M 09/03/03 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE William C. Sheridan, Plaintiff v. Civil No. 02-412-M Opinion No.
2003 DNH 153
James DeHart, Thomas Trevethick, New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, Mark Hanlon, James McDowell, III, and Geraldine Karonis, Defendants O R D E R Pro se plaintiff. Attorney William Sheridan, brings this action seeking damages, costs, and attorney's fees for what he says were "violation[s ] of the federal Constitution, as well as federal laws, such as
28 U.S.C. § 1983
and Section 1 of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.