Legal Opinion
Nitke v. Gonzales
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 25, 2005No. 01 Civ.11476 RMBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom 1 challenge the constitutionality of the Communications Decency Act of 1996(CDA), enacted- as title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 133 (amending and codified at scattered sections of 47 U.S.C.). The CDA’s obscenity provisions make it a crime, inter alia, knowingly to transmit obscenity by means of the Internet to a minor. 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(B). The plaintiffs seek a) a declaratory judgment that the CDA is unconstitutional because it is…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Amnesty International USA v. McConnellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Moberg v. 33T LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009