Legal Opinion

Farrakhan v. Washington

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 24, 2004No. 01-35032PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

359 F.3d 1116

Muhammad Shabazz FARRAKHAN, individually aka Ernest S. Walker; Marcus X. Price, individually; Ramon Barrientes, individually; Timothy Schaaf, individually; Clifton Briceno, individually; Al-Kareem Shaheed, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

State of WASHINGTON, Gary Locke, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Washington; Sam Reed, in his official capacity of Secretary of State and Chief Election Officer for the State of Washington; Joseph Lehman, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Corrections of the State of Washington,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thomas Johnson v. Governor of the State of FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Hayden v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Jalil Abdul Muntaqim, Also Known as Anthony Bottom v. Phillip Coombe, Anthony Annucci, and Louis F. MannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. Farrakhan v. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Harvey v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API