Outcault Advertising Co. v. Waurika Nat. Bank

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, defendant below, wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover judgment, basing the action on a written contract. The parties will be designated as they appeared in the court below.

Plaintiff alleges that on November 20, 1916, plaintiff and defendant executed the following written contract:

“To Outcault Advertising Company,

“508 South Dearborn St., Chicago, Ill.

“Order No-. 8193.

“Date 11-20-1916.

“Ship us at our expense your bank ad service which covers a period of two years, beginning…