Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Archuleta v. Kopp

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1977No. 2611Published

1ConcurrenceHernandez, Judge

(specially concurring).

In my opinion the listing made by the defendant that there was a wood burning fireplace in the den when there was not constituted constructive fraud. Constructive fraud is the breach of a legal or equitable duty which the law declares fraudulent because of its tendency to deceive others. It may consist of not speaking when one has a duty to speak as well as saying that which is false. Neither actual dishonesty of purpose nor intent to deceive is an essential element of constructive fraud. Scudder v. Hart, 45 N.M. 76, 110 P.2d 536 (1941); Barber’s Super Markets, Inc. v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Maxey v. QuintanaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Barber's Super Markets, Inc. v. StrykerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Scudder v. HartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Jack Dailey Realty, Inc. v. MaxeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API