Legal Opinion · Dissent

Joyner v. Glimcher Properties

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 2002No. 3526Published

1DissentHoward, J.

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the failure of Appellant to seek a Writ of Mandamus against the magistrate’s court provides a basis for dismissal of the appeal under the circumstances of this case. I, therefore, respectfully dissent.

The circuit court dismissed the appeal on the grounds that Appellant failed to diligently prosecute the appeal. Dismissal by the circuit court based upon a failure to prosecute an appeal is a discretionary action. See Small v. Mungo, 254 *464S.C. 438, 442, 175 S.E.2d 802, 804 (1970). Therefore, we should reverse only if there is a manifest injustice…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Willimon v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Small v. MungoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. Godwin v. CarriganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API