Legal Opinion
Spagnola v. Mathis
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 30, 1988No. Nos. 84-5530, 84-5659, 84-5822 and 85-5145PublishedCited by 208 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
On December 5, 1986, two panels of this circuit issued separate, conflicting opinions regarding the availability of Bivens1 remedies to litigants challenging federal personnel actions for whom Congress has declined to provide full administrative remedies subject to judicial review under the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA).2 See Hubbard v. EPA, 809 F.2d 1, 6-11 (D.C.Cir.1986); Spagnola v. Mathis, 809 F.2d 16, 19-28 (D.C.Cir.1986). On January 6, 1987, the full court vacated the conflicting portions of the two panel opinions and scheduled the matter for rehearing en banc.…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by208 opinions
- Jeffrey A. Saul v. United States of America Ray Larsen Colleen St. Louis John Doe St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Johnson v. Executive Office for United States AttorneysCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Wilson v. LibbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Vanover v. HantmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Davis v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.