Legal Opinion

Hosford v. Automatic Control Systems, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1984No. 11350 and 11362PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

This action was brought by Harry W. Hosford to recover the principal and interest due on five different notes. After a trial to the court, Hosford was awarded a total of $230,605.78 on all of the notes. This court reverses and remands.

On February 1, 1975, Don Wetzel executed four promissory notes, each for $50,000, as president of AutoControl Service, Inc., the predecessor in interest of Automatic Control Systems, Inc. The amounts were payable to Air Charter Service. Later in 1975, Air Charter Service was liquidated and the notes were assigned to Hosford as its sole shareholder. On February…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rood v. McCannOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Testa v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Markan v. SawchynOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Ohio Valley Mall Co. v. Fashion Gallery, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. First Bank of Ohio v. Wigfield, 07ap-561 (3-20-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Marion Plaza, Inc. v. D & L Ents., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API