Legal Opinion

Capo, Inc. v. Dioptics Medical Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 25, 2004No. 04-1045PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Capo, Inc. appeals an order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, dismissing Capo’s declaratory judgment action against Dioptics Medical Products, Inc. 1 The district court held that, in exercise of its discretion, the action would not be accepted. We conclude that in refusing the action as it arose herein, the district court exceeded the discretionary authority provided by the Declaratory Judgment Act.

BACKGROUND

Dioptics is in the business of producing “wear-over” sunglasses adapted to fit over or clip onto eyeglasses, and Capo…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Public Affairs Associates, Inc. v. RickoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Prasco, LLC v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. SanDisk Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. Micron Technology, Inc. v. Mosaid Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Cat Tech LLC v. TubeMaster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API