Legal Opinion

People v. Brady

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenblatt, J.

In this appeal, we consider the extent to which a trial court, at a Sandoval hearing, may allow cross-examination of a defendant compatibly with the right against compulsory self-incrimination. Defendant contends that the court should not have permitted the prosecutor to question him about an unrelated crime to which he pleaded guilty but for which he had not yet been sentenced. We hold that the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing cross-examination limited to defendant’s admissions at the guilty plea allocution.

On August 11, 1996, defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. People v. BettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. SpitaleriNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CantaveNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. People v. FaethAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. TannenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. People v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API