Legal Opinion

Bridgford v. McAdoo

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1920No. Civ. No. 3281PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

as director-general of railroads, appeals from a judgment rendered against him and in favor of plaintiff for $1,078.32, the proceeds of a check belonging to plaintiff and issued by the paymaster of the quartermaster’s department of the war department. The facts of the case found to be true by the trial court are: On September 18, 1917, one Lawrence entered into a contract with the United States, acting through its war department, for the delivery of 2,500 cords of wood to the department at' Camp Fremont, in San Mateo County. On January 16, 1918, Lawrence entered into a contract with…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Middlesex Insurance v. MannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Fairfield v. W. J. Corbett Hardware Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Knoblock v. Waale-Camplan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Biurrun v. ElizaldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API