Legal Opinion
Gorski v. Local Union 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 14, 1986No. 85 C 05352PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Marie Louise Gorski (“Gorski”) 1 initially sued Federal Signal Corporation (“Signal”) and Local Union No. 134, IBEW (“Union”) under Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”) § 301 (“Section 301”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, claiming:
1. Signal breached its collective bargaining agreement (the “CBA”) with Union by unilaterally reclassifying jobs after the CBA-established cutoff date for such reclassification.
2. Union breached its duty of fair representation toward Signal employees by conspiring with Signal to allow the job reclassifications.
Thereafter…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dutcher v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Ted Pratt v. United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 1435Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Air Wisconsin Pilots Protection Committee v. SandersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Potvin v. Champlain Cable Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Air Wisconsin Pilots Protection Committee v. SandersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.