Legal Opinion
Healy v. Axelrod Construction Co. Defined Benefit Pension Plan & Trust
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 3, 1994No. 91 C 4969PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOBRICK, United States Magistrate Judge.
ORDER
Before the court is the motion of defendant Irwin Axelrod (“Irwin”) to disqualify the law firm of Marks, Marks & Kaplan (“MMK”) from defending his cross-claim against his co-defendants, collectively referred to as the “Axelrod Defendants.”
I. FACTS
Plaintiff William Healy (“Healy”) has filed a four-count complaint against each of the defendants. Count I makes a claim for benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Count II alleges a breach of fiduciary duties against the fiduciaries of the Axelrod…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Analytica, Incorporated v. Npd Research, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Appeals of Schwartz & Freeman and Pressman and Hartunian ChtdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- In Re Corn Derivatives Antitrust Litigation (Mdl 414). Appeal of John E. Koerner & Co., Inc., Imperial Products Corporation, and Pan-O-Gold, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Eleanor Schiessle v. Donald E. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Buckley v. Airshield Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Dignity Health v. Seare (In re Seare)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Diversified Group, Inc. v. DaugerdasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. ReimerdesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- GTE North, Inc. v. Apache Products Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.