Legal Opinion
Diversified Group, Inc. v. Daugerdas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 22, 2001No. 00 Civ. 0771(SAS), 00 Civ. 6484(SAS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
These actions, which have been consolidated for all purposes, arise from a dispute between The Diversified Group, Inc. (“DGI”) and Paul Daugerdas, in connection with the Optional Partnership Strategy (“OPS”), a tax strategy designed to enable individuals or corporations to achieve tax savings through the use of European-style digital options. In the first action, No. 00 Civ. 0771, DGI is suing Daugerdas for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract and unjust enrichment. 1 Specifically, DGI alleges that Daugerdas, as DGI’s attorney, breached his…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Abercrombie v. Andrew CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Seippel v. Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Merck Eprova AG v. ProThera, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Diversified Group, Inc. v. DaugerdasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Matsumura v. Benihana National Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.