Legal Opinion

Dyton v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 16, 1969PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice:

The appellant, Kenneth Dyton, was found ev ca le gjiilty, after a non-jury trial in Superior C rart, of illegally possessing a hypodermic needle and a narcotic drug. He has appealed from the sentences imposed therefor. His contentions are: (1) certain idence should have been suppressed be-use it was seized as the result of an ilal search; and (2) the statute (16 Dsl.C. § 4716) making possession of a hypodermic needle illegal is unconstitutional.

Pursuant to a search warrant, four police officers went to the apartment of one Jcnes, who was a co-defendant in the case below. When…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Henson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Patrick v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  5. State v. BirdsellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gregory v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. State v. CarufelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  3. Marvel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. Tatman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API