Dyton v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice:
The appellant, Kenneth Dyton, was found ev ca le gjiilty, after a non-jury trial in Superior C rart, of illegally possessing a hypodermic needle and a narcotic drug. He has appealed from the sentences imposed therefor. His contentions are: (1) certain idence should have been suppressed be-use it was seized as the result of an ilal search; and (2) the statute (16 Dsl.C. § 4716) making possession of a hypodermic needle illegal is unconstitutional.
Pursuant to a search warrant, four police officers went to the apartment of one Jcnes, who was a co-defendant in the case below. When…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Henson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Patrick v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- State v. BirdsellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gregory v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- State v. CarufelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- Marvel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Tatman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.