Tatman v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Chief Justice:
The defendant appeals his conviction for possession of hypodermic needles and syringes [16 Del.C. § 4716(c) and (d)]. He asserts that the police violated the “knock- and-announce” rule, Dyton v. State, Del.Supr., 250 A.2d 383 (1969), thus rendering illegal their search and seizure of the drug paraphernalia involved.
At 6:00 a. m., acting under a warrant to search Patricia Browning’s apartment, police officers knocked on the street door of the multi-family building which housed her apartment; they waited about five seconds, then broke the door down with sledge hammers.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Duke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Marvel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kornegay v. CottinghamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Gregory v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- United States v. RodriguezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.