Legal Opinion

Tatman v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 1, 1974PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

The defendant appeals his conviction for possession of hypodermic needles and syringes [16 Del.C. § 4716(c) and (d)]. He asserts that the police violated the “knock- and-announce” rule, Dyton v. State, Del.Supr., 250 A.2d 383 (1969), thus rendering illegal their search and seizure of the drug paraphernalia involved.

At 6:00 a. m., acting under a warrant to search Patricia Browning’s apartment, police officers knocked on the street door of the multi-family building which housed her apartment; they waited about five seconds, then broke the door down with sledge hammers.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Duke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Marvel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kornegay v. CottinghamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Gregory v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. United States v. RodriguezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  4. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API