Legal Opinion
In re Luma Camera Service, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1943No. 80681PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The respondent, Joseph F. Maggio, president of the bankrupt, brings up for review the Referee’s order of August 9, 1943, which directed the respondent to turn over to the trustee merchandise belonging to the estate of the amount and value of $17,500, or the proceeds of the sale of said merchandise.
The bankrupt corporation was engaged in the business of selling photographic equipment and supplies at 340 West 42nd Street, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York. The respondent was the principal active officer and manager of the bankrupt. He owned the stock and dominated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- In Re Pinsky-Lapin & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Danish v. SofranskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Seligson v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Robbins v. GottbetterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Luma Camera Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949