Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Avco Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 84-473PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue presented in this case is whether the trial court properly refused to certify this case as a class action. This court holds that the denial of class certification herein did not rise to the level of abuse of discretion and accordingly upholds the rulings of the lower courts.

The law to be applied to this case is not in dispute. It is well-established that a trial judge has broad discretion in determining whether a class action may be maintained. Absent a showing of abuse of discretion, a *313trial court’s determination as to class certification will not be disturbed. See, e.g.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vinci v. American Can Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cope v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Stammco, L.L.C. v. United Tel. Co. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API