Legal Opinion

King v. Connors

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.

The only question brought before us by the appeal is whether the decree * appealed from conforms to the re-script stating the decision of this court in King v. Connors, 222 Mass. 261. Phelps v. Lowell Institution for Savings, 214 Mass. 560. The defendants have not sought leave to open the case'for a new trial by reason of matters which have arisen since the decision of the issues raised by the pleadings; and no such alleged facts can; be considered on this appeal. The decree must be construed in the light of the facts as found by the master, and confirmed by this court. Attorney General v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nashua & Lowell Railroad v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Attorney General v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Jacob v. ConnorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Phelps v. Lowell Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. E. Kronman, Inc. v. Bunn Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Gamwell v. BigleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Edgecomb v. EdmonstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Crowley v. HoldsworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API