Legal Opinion
Gamwell v. Bigley
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 14, 1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The facts are set out in Gamwell v. Bigley, 250 Mass. 140, where it was decided that the plaintiff was entitled to injunctive relief and his exceptions were sustained. Following that decision a decree was entered in the Superior *380Court directing the defendant forthwith to remove so much of the buildings located on his property on Columbus Avenue, Pittsfield, as extended upon the right of way appurtenant to the plaintiff’s land, with the exception of the brick structure referred to in the master’s report and in the opinion as a “store”; and permanently restraining the defendant from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Everson v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Pickard v. ClancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Fordyce v. DillawayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Smith v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Morin v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Bleck v. East Boston Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Blair's Foodland Inc. v. Shuman's Foodland, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Commonwealth v. BouchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Zevitas v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.