Legal Opinion
United States v. Trupiano
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 4, 1947No. 4308cPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
The government filed a complaint against the defendants, petitioners herein, charging violation of the Internal Revenue Laws. The petitioners moved to suppress certain evidence held by the government against them, claiming that since it was obtained without a search warrant their constitutional rights were invaded. For the purpose of the motion, affidavits were submitted by the government, and the petitioners offered the record of the preliminary examination before the United States Commissioner.
In January 1946 the petitioners leased part of the Copeland Kell Farm,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rocchia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- In Re MilburneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- United States v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Pong Ying v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. RoettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948